DaggerSpell v4.0

• -------------------------------------------------------------------------
• Reduce spell casting costs.
• -------------------------------------------------------------------------
• Author:
• - "DaggerSpell 4. 0" ( Reworked "CostReduce v3. 1" ) by Oghma (who will accept all
• the blames and accords all the credits to Aragon).
• Credits:
• - Original "CostReduce v3. 1" Aragon (morrowind.aragon@xs4all.nl)
• This mod is a refined (and completely rewritten) version Horatio's
• excellent "horatio_casting2" mod (http://thelys.free.fr/horatio.htm)
• and fixes several small bugs. Thanks to Horatio (& Eldar) for his nice plugin!

Version: 4. 0, Chrismas' gift before an happy new year 2018.

Original "CastReduce" by Aragon (inspired by Horatio): This mod reduces the casting cost of a spell based on your skill level in the corresponding magic school (destruction, mysticism, etc). It allows you to develop your mages more satisfactory at higher levels.

The spell costs will not be lower in the spell menu but they will cost less when cast. The mod will not allow you to cast a spell though, when you don't have enough magicka to cast the spell with its original cost.

"DaggerSpell" (reworked "CastReduce" by Oghma) The magicka cost of a spell is reduced in a DaggerFall's parabolic way and tends to a minimum of 10% in an hyperbolic way (see below).

Why DaggerSpell ? Because I hate linear function and I love the way it was handled in Daggerfall. Most of mods made 'till now were too linear or weirdly thought like "Mastering- Magicka" by DopeyFish, or too drifting like "Magicka Based Skill Progression" by Hotfusion (i find some of his ideas very interesting but a bit too much constrained). Have a look at the charts provided as Jpeg to see my point of view.

Most of all , all these has no sight about high level in schools of Magic. If a reach a skill level 200 or above , even temporary , by any regular mean (Enchant ) without "tweak or cheat", I think he deserves a little extra facility. I provide two different curve for the weighting computation : one with an hyperbola^4 and the other with an hyperbola^2, respectively named "DaggerSpell^2" & "DaggerSpell^4". I force nobody to use one more than the other but still consider "DaggerSpell^2" , none the less. I began coding with the hyperbola^4 which gives a result quite close to a real Gaussian but I found it too generous at higher skill level. So I chose an hyperbola^2 that giv